However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the friendship of the victim B.

1. On June 9, 2016, around 09:50, and around 14:40, the Defendant destroyed property equivalent to 300,000 won at the market price by driving the E-wit truck, which is a dangerous object to the Plaintiff, on the ground that the victim does not have to pay his/her money, in D operated by the injured party of the interest-gu, Young-si, Young-si, the Defendant damaged the said glass, etc. by driving the E-wit truck, which is a dangerous object to the Plaintiff, to the front door and the front door of the said business.

2. On June 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.225% alcohol level from the parking lot for the foregoing establishment up to the entrance door; (b) around 14:40 on June 9, 2016, the Defendant driven a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.225%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to make a statement on the circumstances of driving at home, a report on detection of drivers at home, the numerical value of alcohol measurement, and an investigation report;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 369(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148-2(2)1 and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act that a victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the circumstances leading to the instant crime, etc. shall be considered);