If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a husband B's husband who is engaged in driving a car.

On April 4, 2013, 08:10, Samsung's name in the Song-dong, Andong-si, had the front way of the first apartment zone, from the port side of Song-dong, to the friendly apartment zone.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk in order not to obstruct the crossing of the pedestrian, or cause any danger to the pedestrian.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the victim D (the age eight) who crosses the crosswalk from the direction of the proceeding to the left side of the respondent's vehicle, and the top of the victim D (the age eight) who crosses the crosswalk.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the 4-day left-hand part of the 4-day left-hand side of the treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report and diagnosis report;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order and reflection thereof, the fact that the victim seems to have recovered since the vehicle covered by a comprehensive insurance policy, the primary offender, and the road situation at the time of the occurrence of the instant accident