채무부존재확인
1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim is dismissed.
2. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is 14,545.
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff served as the head of the Defendant’s partnership from September 25, 2009 to March 20, 2015.
B. On March 3, 2015, the Defendant pointed out the following as a result of the occasional audit of member cooperatives conducted from February 23, 2015 to February 25, 2015 by the National Forestry Cooperatives Federation from February 23, 2015, and demanded that the Plaintiff recover KRW 14,546,00 (the amount to be rounded off the white unit, and the amount not rounded off is KRW 14,545,660) from the Plaintiff.
1) According to the budget compilation guidelines applicable to the Defendant, a cooperative head may not pay a transportation subsidy if he/she operates a government vehicle. From January 1, 2011 to February 24, 2015, the Plaintiff was paid KRW 11,974,660 as stated in the “the details of the payment of the transportation subsidy for the head of the cooperative since 11 years” as stated in attached Table 1, “the details of the payment of the transportation subsidy for the head of the cooperative after 201”. 2) On December 24, 2014, the Defendant paid KRW 2,101,00 to the Plaintiff without undergoing the resolution of the general meeting required by the articles of association.
3) The Defendant paid the Plaintiff more than KRW 470,00 for six-day travel expenses, as stated in [Attachment 2], even though the period of the business trip to the Plaintiff and the number of actual business trips are inconsistent with the purpose of the business trip. D. Accordingly, on April 14, 2015, the Defendant demanded that the Plaintiff return the said KRW 14,546,000 to the Plaintiff, as well as the details of excessive payment of travel expenses for the business trip, as stated in [Attachment 2], although the period of the business trip to the Plaintiff and the number of actual business trips are inconsistent with the purpose of the business trip. The Defendant demanded that the Plaintiff return the said KRW 14,546,000 to the Plaintiff.
1. Amendment of the articles of association;
2. Dissolution or division;
3. Merger;
4. Expulsion of a member;
5. Election and removal of officers;
6. Business plan and revenue and expenditure budget;
7. To become a promoter of the National Federation or to join or withdraw from the National Federation;
8. Remuneration of executives and reimbursement of actual expenses;