1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is maintained. The Defendants are forced departure in the event that the sentence of the court below is maintained. The contents of the crime of this case are not matters to the extent that the Defendants should be forced departure. The crime of this case is contingent as a result of minor trial costs, and the victims assault the Defendants. In light of the fact that the sentence imposed by the court below to the Defendants (two years of suspended sentence in August of each imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendants participated in the crime of this case after receiving Defendant A’s call from the scene of the crime of this case. In light of the criminal behavior of assaulting one victim, the quality of the crime is not good in light of the criminal behavior of assaulting one victim. The crime of this case is mainly affected by the victim’s face and the expected treatment period is considerable, and the victim was punished against the Defendants at the time of making a statement at the investigative agency, and there is no evidence to deem that the damage recovery was made thereafter. In full view of the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the circumstances following the crime of this case, the defendants’ age, environment, personality and conduct, and other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, the punishment of the Defendants is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. Thus, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the "Defendant I" in Part II of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected to "Defendant C". [Defendant A, Defendant D] and Defendant A did not submit the statement of grounds for appeal within 20 days from the delivery date of the notification of the receipt of the notification from each of these courts on December 16, 2014, and the petition of appeal does not include the grounds for appeal in the statement of grounds for appeal.