교통사고처리특례법위반
Defendant
All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.
1. As to the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant is too unfasible, and the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair.
2. On the other hand, the accused recognizes the facts charged and reflects it, and the vehicle that the accused drives is insured by the Trucking Mutual Aid Association;
On the other hand, the accident of this case resulted in a serious result of the death of the victim, and the defendant does not seem to have made any effort for the victim and his/her bereaved family members, and the bereaved family members want to be punished by the defendant.
Examining the above circumstances, the Defendant’s age, sex, and environment, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment appears to be reasonable. As such, the foregoing unfair argument in sentencing by the Defendant and the Prosecutor is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (The part of the criminal facts of the judgment of the court below, which is described as the "serious Highway", in the part of the crime of the court below, is obvious that it is a clerical error in the "serious Highway", and such error