대여금
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 25,000,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and 13.0% per annum from September 1, 2012 to March 18, 2016.
1. In full view of the facts that there is no dispute over the cause of the claim, and the purport of the entire arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9, defendant C would use the amount as business funds of defendant B, her husband, and the amount of KRW 30 million on August 12, 200, KRW 270 million on April 27, 201, KRW 270 million on April 4, 201, and KRW 20 million on the remaining amount of KRW 30 million on June 7, 2004, the defendant C had an obligation to pay the remaining amount of KRW 20 million on June 1, 200 to the plaintiff at the rate of KRW 60,000,000,000 on June 7, 2004, each of the above agreements that the plaintiff agreed to pay KRW 60,000 on June 10, 201 to the plaintiff.
2. Determination as to the defendants' defense
A. The Defendants’ defense of repayment shall be at least KRW 25 million, which was paid by the Plaintiff on June 2004, as well as at KRW 25 million on June 30, 2004. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 18458, Jun. 30, 2004>