When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 24, 2016, the Defendant driven C Lerefa on the 16:46th day of July 24, 2016, and continued to drive on the side of the 3-lane 23-lane from the right edge to the intersection of the East Sea at the speed of about 30 kilometers from the right edge to the intersection of the East Sea.

At the same time, E Scar car was parked at the right edge of the road, which is owned by the victim D, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent the accident, such as a safe driving, etc., by a person engaged in driving of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant neglected to go on the front side by neglecting it, and led to the conflict between the left-hand side of the said earth and a car parked on the right-hand side of the Defendant’s running direction, which led to the conflict between the two sides of the Defendant’s vehicle.

After all, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, destroyed the car of the above 130,000 won for repair, and did not immediately stop the car and take necessary measures, such as confirming the existence of damage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident and field photographs;

1. The receipt [the defendant's assertion that the accident occurred, but the defendant's assertion that the accident occurred but leaves the scene can be acknowledged in light of the following circumstances, i.e., ① the damaged vehicle's damaged part is destroyed due to the traffic accident in this case, ② the owner of the damaged vehicle has shocked to an extent that it turns out of the house, ③ the third party who used the vehicle in the opposite direction was driving the vehicle, ③ the fact that the defendant was aware of the accident but left the scene. The defendant's argument is without merit).

1. Criminal facts;