2. Of the costs of lawsuit, the part pertaining to the participation in the litigation is the intervenor joining the Plaintiff.

A. Around 200 and around 2002, the Intervenor entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant with the Plaintiff’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) and the Defendant (hereinafter “each of the instant insurance contracts”) entered into two insurance contracts, including the Defendant’s non-permanent and healthy life insurance.

B. The main contents of each of the insurance contracts of this case are the terms and conditions of each of the insurance contracts of this case, and class 4 of the disability are as follows: “When she has permanently left with a significant obstacle to the eyesight of the eye,” and class 6 of the disability, “when she has permanently left with a significant obstacle to the eyesight of the eye,” respectively.

C. At around 22:10 on May 1, 2004, the Intervenor suffered an injury by an assault from E, F, G, and H at the D main points located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and suffered an injury, such as a non-alley felb, which requires approximately 4 weeks of treatment.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

1) On July 9, 2012, the Intervenor was diagnosed as “(i) the frame of the wall and the right, (ii) the inner balone, (iii) the balone, and (iv) the balone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone salone ss

3) The Defendant determined that the intervenor’s visual disability falls under class 6 disability under the terms and conditions of each of the insurance contracts of this case, and that the intervenor sought to pay 39 million won for disability insurance benefit of class 6 to the intervenor, but the intervenor refused to receive the above disability insurance proceeds on the ground that the intervenor’s visual disability falls under class 4 disability under the terms and conditions of each of the insurance contracts of this case. E. The Plaintiff’s collection of claims and payment of insurance proceeds of the Defendant 1) based on the authentic copy of a notarial deed with executory power of No. 649, August 17, 2012, which is the law firm name of the notary public, the Seoul Western District Court 2012Ta10945.