Part concerning Defendant B and C shall be reversed.

Defendant

B and C shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

A. Defendant A1’s misunderstanding of fact (Confiscation part) is unreasonable to confiscate all seized articles in the game of this case that were used in the game of this case because it is difficult to accurately specify the above customers and it is difficult to specify the game machine used by them, although the Defendant intended to accumulate points in managing customers by using a non-registered electronic card, a non-registered electronic card.

2) The lower court’s sentence against an unfair defendant in sentencing (the imprisonment of eight months and the suspension of execution of two years) is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s punishment against Defendant B and C (2 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Defendant A1) In light of the legislative purport of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, including Article 44(1)1 and (2) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, the eradication of speculative game products, and the creation of a healthy game culture, as to the assertion of mistake of facts, Defendant A1’s game products owned or occupied by the person who caused others to gamble or perform other speculative acts, or neglect to do so, in violation of Article 44(1)1 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, the game products owned or occupied by him/her have a substantial contribution to the performance of such act.

인정되는 한, 게임산업진흥에 관한 법률 제 44조 제 2 항에 규정된 필요적 몰 수의 대상이 된다고 할 것이다( 대법원 2011. 3. 10. 선고 2009도 70 판결 등 참조). 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, 피고인 A는 이 사건 게임 장 내에 해풍 포커 게임기 30대, 황금 포커성 게임기 20대를 설치하고 이 사건 게임 장에 온 손님들에게 자동 시작 버튼( 일명 똑딱이) 을 이용하여 게임을 하게 하였으며, 적립카드를 발행하여 주고 게임 후 남은 점수를 위 적립카드에 입력하여 재사용할 수...