If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

1. On May 23, 2015, from around 03:30 to 04:30 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by failing to enter the restaurant by making it impossible for female customers entering the restaurant, who had not been able to talk with the victim E, who is an employee, without any particular reason, and who had been seated on the table.

2. From around 08:00 on May 23, 2015 to 08:30 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by preventing customers entering the restaurant by bringing the disturbance to the restaurant, such as: (a) having the customer talked with “I”, and having the customer talked with “I” without any particular reason; and (b) having the customer talked with “I”, an employee, who is an employee, of the Plaintiff, “I am Ha, and I am.”

3. On May 23, 2015, from around 09:00 to around 09:40 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed in a restaurant located in Do Government I “J”; (b) expressed, without any particular reason, the victim K and customers who are his employees “Chewing”; and (c) expressed to female employees who were eating, “I see, I see, according to Ethical medicine,” but they were refused, but I see, “I see, I see, according to Ethical medicine, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, and “I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see,” and obstructed the victim’s business restaurant business affairs by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of K;

1. Each statement of E and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs, details of 112 reports;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the provision applicable to the crime and the choice of punishment shall interfere with the business of Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the defendant again commits each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime, and the fact that there are records of