beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.10.20 2014고정1632

업무상횡령

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the head of Yangsan City Village, from around 2011 to 2012, is a person who has overall control over the revenue and expenditure of the C Village Development Group and C Village Funds.

On February 18, 2011, the Defendant received KRW 200,000,000 from D, which was the head of the Residents' Self-Governing Committee of the Rural Community in Gyeyang-si, which had been the head of the said C Village, to transfer the said C Village, and embezzled the said amount for personal purposes by paying KRW 300,000,000 of the Defendant’s membership fee out of the said money for the said money for the purpose of the C Village Private Complex, a victim, on February 18, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The prosecutor's interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 356 of the Criminal Act and Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (in cases of the inducement in a workhouse, 100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59 (1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59 (1) of the suspended sentence: Fine of 200,000 won, the amount embezzled is a small amount of KRW 300,000, the defendant recognizes the crime, the first offender