beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.01.17 2015고단982

사기등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for six months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 7 years and a fine of 500 million won on December 24, 2014 for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Seoul High Court on July 25, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 24, 2014. Defendant B was sentenced to eight months for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Suwon District Court on June 10, 2010 and completed the execution of the sentence in the lawsuit of Suwon District District on October 25, 2010, and was sentenced to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Seoul High Court on July 25, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 24, 2014.

[2015 Highest 982] (Defendant A and B) (hereinafter “Defendant B”) obtained a blank check indicating at least KRW 100,000,000,000 from banking employees, and then, Defendant B planned to commit the act of forging the so-called “dunes round check” by securing the check number and copy of the original check to be issued at KRW 100,00,000,000 by paying fees to the bondholder, and by means of securing the check number and copy of the original check, and to enter them in the said blank check.

Defendant

B At the end of December 2012, F shall deduct F, a financial hub, from a blank check paper through a bank employee.

On the other hand, the 20% of the check amount is forged and the 20% of the check amount is introduced from F to Defendant A, the vice head of the G branch office in the National Bank G branch in the National Bank. Defendant A conspired with Defendant B to deduct the blank check paper and to provide loan guarantee in order to cover the cost of the forged check work.

As above, the Defendants conspired to acquire money from the victim I who was introduced through H in order to raise expenses for the work of counterfeit checks.

The Defendants, through H on January 2013, 2013, wanting to obtain a loan to the victim as security through “Yannam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, J-si, and there is a need to provide a deposit to K who owns the land.