청소년보호법위반
The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended.
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A is a person who operates the main points with the trade name called Sil Jin-si D.
No one shall sell, lend, or distribute drugs harmful to juveniles, etc. to juveniles.
Nevertheless, around February 24:00 on February 5, 2012, the Defendant did not verify the age, such as confirming the identification card of E (18 years of age and remaining) of a juvenile who was found to be a guest at the above main point, and sold 4 illness of liquor (360ml).
2. Defendant B is a person who operates a trade name F at the time of the medical examination.
No one shall sell, lend, or distribute drugs harmful to juveniles, etc. to juveniles.
Nevertheless, around February 21, 2012, the Defendant sold 1 bottled 2 and 1 bottled 2 as alcoholic beverages (360ml) without verifying the age by confirming the identification card of E (the age of 18, South) a juvenile who was found to be a guest at the above main point on February 5, 2012.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Statement to E by the police;
1. Copy of the screen board (No. 3) and copy of the business registration certificate (No. 4) ;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a copy of the sales account book and a copy of the business report certificate (No. 11);
1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: Each of the Defendants’ Articles 51 Subparag. 8 and 26(1) of the former Juvenile Protection Act (Amended by Act No. 11048, Sep. 15, 201) (amended by Act No. 11048, Sept. 15
1. Defendants to be suspended from sentence: Fine of 500,000 won; and
1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day);
1. The Defendants: Defendant A under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act: at the time of the Defendant’s entry into the main place, the Defendant inspected and confirmed the age of the Defendant, in turn, according to the identification card of the Defendant, and at this time, the Defendant intentionally avoided the identification card by means of return to the place at the time of the order of alcohol, and there are circumstances to be considered in light of the circumstance, and there is no criminal records against the Defendant.