사기
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
The defendant is an applicant for compensation, who is an applicant for compensation, of KRW 11 million.
Punishment of the crime
[2013 Highest 565]
1. Around September 2009, the Defendant against the victim D referred to as “the victim D, who became aware of through the online game “kicker”, to the victim D who invested money in a bond business, can be seen as gain if he/she invests in money. Even if a small amount of money is fine, if there is any surplus, he/she is able to make an investment.”
However, in fact, the defendant not only lent a small amount of money to the branch, but also did not have the intention or ability to pay the profit or the principal of the investment even if he/she received an investment because he/she is thought to use it as a cost of living.
Ultimately, around September 16, 2009, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 1 million from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant under the name of the Defendant for the purpose of investment deposit, and acquired by transfer the total amount of KRW 14.7 million from around that time to January 13, 201, as shown in the attached crime list, from around 37 times, as shown in the attached crime list.
2. Around April 30, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim E was aware of the victim E through online game “the property he/she owns” at the G coffee shop neighboring Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu. The main issue is that the head of the Tong is making an investment in yachts and the expressway business. Around September 30, 2012, the defendant was paid KRW 28 million per month by investing KRW 10 million in the business he/she performs. C was paid KRW 28 million per month by investing the yacht business management in this case and at the same time investing KRW 20 million in the Highway Corporation.”
However, in fact, the defendant did not engage in yachts and expressway investment business, and even if C has not received a return of KRW 28 million from the victim because it did not have invested KRW 10 million in the defendant, it would grant profits or the principal of investment.