around 18:40 on November 20, 2019, the Defendant stolen the “D” operated by the victim C in Do Government-si B, Do-si around 18:40 on November 20, 2019, using the gaps in the management of the victim, with the total market price of 58,000 won owned by the victim at the display site, which is equivalent to the total market price of 58,00 won.

"2019 Highest 6010"

1. On July 31, 2019, the Defendant: (a) stolen the thief with 2 beer and coffees equivalent to KRW 17,900 at the market price displayed at the victim’s place using the gaps in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected; (b) around 18:35, July 31, 2019, within the G management of the victim F, which was located in Ma, i.e., the Defendant: (c) committed theft.

2. On October 28, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with 2 clicks equivalent to 50,800 won at the market price where the victim I was displayed at the scene using a cre in which surveillance by the victim was neglected; (b) around 11:40 on October 28, 2019, the Defendant: (c) committed theft with 2 clicks equivalent to 50,800 won in the market price where the victim I was displayed at the scene using such cre in which surveillance was neglected.

Summary of Evidence

"2019 Highest 5144"

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement of damage photographic account "2019 Highest 6010";

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of field CCTV photographs and specifications-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act have had a record of having been punished several times as a crime under the same law even before the defendant committed the same crime, and even after the suspended sentence was rendered for the same crime, the defendant again committed each of the instant crimes within a short time.

Although the amount of damage is not significant and the damaged goods were arrested immediately after the crime was recovered, there is a high possibility of criticism in that it repeats the crime even though the punishment was imposed several times.

However, the motive and background of the crime, the method and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, such as the fact that it appears to have been committed due to difficulties in living.