손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff's assertion is asserted as follows. The plaintiff claims 100 million won and damages for delay against the defendants for tort compensation.
The Defendants said to the effect that the Plaintiff “I will leave the Plaintiff’s interest in addition to the principal, while I would like to register the Plaintiff as a director of the company when I would like to use the Plaintiff as a company’s company’s company’s company’s company’s business of producing the
On October 23, 2012, the Plaintiff trusted the Defendants’ horses, remitted KRW 80,00 to the account of D Co., Ltd., and paid KRW 20,000 to Defendant C.
However, there was no plan for the production and export of Malaysia.
The Defendants did not have any intention or ability to return the amount of KRW 100 million even if paid by the Plaintiff.
2. According to the purport of the evidence Nos. 3 and 4 and the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 80,000 to the Plaintiff’s account on October 23, 2012, and the Defendant C’s transfer of KRW 20,000 to the Defendant C is recognized.
However, the remaining evidence alone is insufficient to recognize the fact that the Plaintiff lent the above money to the Defendants, and that the Plaintiff was a business that has no substance of the business that had no substance of the Malaysia production and export business, and no other evidence exists
Rather, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in evidence Nos. 1 and 6, Defendant B claimed that the above KRW 80,000 won was invested and KRW 20,000 won was paid in the course of the vehicle exchange. The Plaintiff was appointed as an internal director of the above D on October 10, 2012, prior to the transfer of money, and was stationed in the above company after being appointed, and was permanently stationed in the above company on October 23, 2012. The Plaintiff transferred the above money on October 23, 2012. The Plaintiff’s business was up to six months, and the said company was recognized as having produced and sent the horsetolus and packaging boxes to China during the said custody.
Ultimately, the Defendants deceiving the Plaintiff.