2. The defendant shall make the plaintiff 5.

A. The defendant is a person who runs a construction business under the trade name of "C", and the plaintiff is a person employed by the defendant as an employee and has worked as an entertainment worker.

B. At the Defendant’s workplace located in Bocheon-si D, there was a dog in the Amerasa (hereinafter “instant guard dog”).

On October 20, 2017, E, the Defendant’s wife, filled out a dog different from the instant guard dog, and requested the Plaintiff to take out another dog from the instant guard dog, among which other dogs were put in the breeding pool, to the Plaintiff.

Accordingly, the security dogs of this case, which the plaintiff was removed from the above breeding place, did not combine the plaintiff's other dog, went out of the above breeding place and the plaintiff's right bridge, and thereby, the plaintiff suffered injuries such as sub-satisfing down of the lower right bridge.

At the time, the security dog of this case was not installed with safety devices, such as a entrance dog.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) C.

The Plaintiff was hospitalized in the F Hospital from October 20, 2017 to December 14, 2017 due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 14, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number with serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. We examine the legitimacy of the part concerning the claim for transportation cost of KRW 36,800, which was due to the physical examination, among the instant lawsuits, in accordance with the physical examination ex officio, of the part concerning the claim for transportation cost of KRW 36,800, among the instant lawsuits.

The plaintiff asserts to the effect that "the defendant is obligated to pay the above money to the plaintiff because he suffered a loss of transportation cost of 36,800 won to make a physical appraisal in the course of the lawsuit of this case due to the accident of this case."

In a lawsuit seeking compensation for damages caused by the tort of another person, the court's order shall be the order of the court, when the court has received the physical appraisal in accordance with the court's order for appraisal.