If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On July 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) visited the victim with the police officer in a place where the victim D was gathered, and (b) two other persons, etc., are gathered from the family of the victim C apartment B, 102, Sipo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si; and (c)

However, the victim did not have embezzled the construction cost at the time of the above apartment construction.

The Defendant openly damaged the reputation of the victim by publicly pointing out false facts as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each legal statement statute of witness D, E, and F;

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;