가. 피고인 (1) 사실오인 ㈎ 2016. 3. 13. 특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)의 점 피고인이 피해자의 지갑을 주웠는데, 피고인의 전과 때문에 경찰이 의심할 것이 두려워 경찰에 가져다 주지 못하고 직접 주인을 찾아주기 위하여 피고인이 알고 있는 장소에 보관했던 것일 뿐 절취한 사실이 없고, 불법영득의사도 없었다.

㈏ 2016. 3. 19. 각 범행의 점 피고인은 2016. 3. 19. 오전 일찍 시흥시 신천동에 가서 여자친구를 만나 함께 시간을 보냈으므로 인천 서구에서 발생한 2016. 3. 19.자 각 범행을 저지른 사실이 없다.

㈐ 2016. 3. 22. 주거침입의 점 공소사실 기재 일시, 장소에서 L의 주거에 침입한 사실이 없다.

(2) The lower court’s sentence (one year and six months of imprisonment) against the Defendant of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence adopted by the prosecutor (1) by mistake of facts or misapprehension of the legal principle, the court below found the Defendant guilty on March 19, 2016 on the charge of housing intrusion C and on March 22, 2016 on the charge of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief). However, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles or misapprehending the legal principles.

(2) The lower court’s sentence on the Defendant of unreasonable sentencing is too unjustifiable and unjust.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts, namely, ① the Defendant not only kept the victim E’s wallet in a place recognizable to him, but also did not take any action to find the main person for a considerable period of time, and ② the Defendant’s assertion that he was in Sincheon-dong on March 19, 2016 was started only after the prosecution was instituted in the lower court, unlike the statement made by the investigative agency.