2. In light of the fact that the defendant's criminal act was committed, the defendant's business was suspended and discontinued after the crackdown, there was no history of punishment for imprisonment with prison labor or suspended execution, and there was no history of punishment for the same kind of crime, the crime of this case is not good in light of the circumstances of the crime, period, method and contents, etc. that the defendant used game products by giving exchange value to the certificate of score keeping, and the crime of this case requires strict punishment due to considerable social harm, such as causing excessive gambling of the people and undermining sound game culture, etc. In full view of all the circumstances that are the conditions of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive, means and result of the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided

(However, in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, “1. Confiscation of Criminal Code, Article 48(1)1 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, “after addition,” Article 44(2) of the same Act, shall be corrected.