beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.03.23 2015고단5016

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the driver of the freight vehicle B 17.5 tons to which the Defendant belongs.

A around January 6, 1996, around 12:06, on the street in front of the Dong-dong highway in Gwangju-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City, loaded a steel plate on the said cargo vehicle and operated a 1.1 ton of more than 10 tons while being operated as a female waterway in Gwangju-gu, thereby violating the restrictions on the operation of vehicles of the road management agency.

Accordingly, A, an employee of the defendant, committed a violation as above in relation to the defendant's business.

2. The judgment prosecutor applied Articles 86 and 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) to a summary order subject to review and the punishment of a fine of KRW 300,00 was finalized, but Article 86 of the same Act provides that if an agent, employee or other employee of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article.

“The portion of the Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga, October 28, 2010, ruled 2010, retroactively lost its effect.

Therefore, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.