1. As to the Defendant A’s grounds of appeal, the lower court convicted Defendant A of all the charges on Defendant A on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the determination standard of documents subject to inspection, legal errors in the crime of uttering of the investigation documents, intentional duties in the crime of acceptance of bribe, and duty-related duties and additional collection in the crime of violation of Articles 85 subparag. 5 and 24(3)5 of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Act No. 13508, Sept. 1, 2015; hereinafter “former Act”), the meaning and scope of the resolution of a general meeting of union members, and Articles 86 subparag. 6 and 81(6) of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents.

2. As to Defendant B’s appeal, Defendant B did not submit the appellate brief within the submission period, and Defendant B did not state the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.