If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

On April 3, 2013, at around 20:0, the Defendant issued an order of 1 disease, 10,000 won, 460,000 won in total from tin, i.e., 1 disease, 10,000, and 460,000 won as if she did not have any intention or ability to pay the price in the “Dju” managed by Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Victim C.

In this way, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the above property and acquired the property benefits of the same amount of money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect with respect to E or F;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds of sentencing of the provisional payment order is based on a comprehensive consideration of the amount of damage and the circumstances leading to the instant case after the summary order of this case.