국토의계획및이용에관한법률위반등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. Any person who intends to change the form or quality of land in violation of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act shall obtain permission from the competent authorities;
Nevertheless, on July 14, 2014, the Defendant, without permission, changed the form and quality of land by performing the suspension work of about 1m with height of about 2, C, D, and E.
2. Anyone who intends to build any urban park in violation of the Urban Parks and Greenbelts, etc. Act shall obtain permission from the competent administrative agency;
Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission, set up 13 putains (area 460.8mm2) in Yongsan-si B and E, each urban park, and installed 3 containers (area 13 x 7.3m2) in D, and installed 1 a simplified swimming pool (area 300m2) in E.
3. Any person who intends to construct a temporary building in violation of the Building Act shall obtain permission from the competent administrative agency;
Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission, installed one plastic house (94.9 square meters), a temporary building, and 11 Mongolian (460.8 square meters) in a temporary building C at the time of paragraph (1).
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each accusation, written statement, detailed statement of offenses, and unlawful field photographs;
1. Article 140 subparagraph 1 of the relevant Article on criminal facts, Article 140 and Article 56 (1) 2 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (unauthorized change of form and quality), Article 53 Subparag. 2 and Article 24 (1) 1 of the Act on Urban Parks, Greenbelts, Etc. (the occupation of installing an unauthorized structure within an urban park), Article 110 Subparag. 3 and Article 20 (1) of the Building Act, and the selection of fines;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Consideration, such as the fact that the sentence of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order is completed to restore the original state after being investigated as the case of this case, and the fact that the crime is recognized and reflected