However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 17:20 on July 16, 2013, the Defendant, in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Village, had the victim D (year 71) (year 71) who sited in a bee and fright and frighting in a bee and fright to drink and drink at a bee and take the face of the victim once, and had the victim go beyond the floor due to its shock, without any reason, and had the victim go beyond the floor. In addition, the Defendant dumpeded the face of the victim for about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation;

1. The recommended type of sentencing criteria: Violence, general injury, and general person who is specially injured by general injury: Scope of recommending a minor injury (requirements of mitigation): Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two months to one year (limited to mitigation): Whether or not a stay of execution has been granted: A comprehensive comparison and evaluation of the causes for postponement of collection of office - Where the causes for postponement of collection of office have been taken into account - Where the causes for major unjust causes are identical to a fine not less than three times or not more than five years - Where the causes for minor injury and the patterns of crimes are insignificant - Where the causes for general unjust causes are minor: At least two times: A period of suspension of execution

2. Four months of imprisonment with prison labor, one year of a suspended sentence, and probation;