2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable circumstance such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case while committing the crime of this case, the fact that there is an agreement with the victimJ, etc. However, in light of the addiction of narcotics and the harm caused by medication of narcotics, there is a need to strictly punish and eradicate the crimes of narcotics, and the defendant has inflicted bodily injury by exercising an undiscriminatory assault against the victimJ without any justifiable reason. This is a case where the harm and risk of the crime of this case are shown typically, and the crime is poor and the danger of the crime is very high (in spite the defendant displayed the victimJ with the view of the crime of this case, the victimJ did not comply with the victim's injury even though the defendant displayed it). However, there is a history of criminal punishment for several times due to narcotics and violent crimes (including one time, two times a suspended sentence execution), the fact that the defendant administered phiphonephones, and the fact that there is no possibility that there is a considerable possibility that there is a change in circumstances in the circumstances of the crime of this case, such as subsequent recommendation or new medication.

The scope of recommendations (basic area): the term of imprisonment of October to two years, and the term of final recommendations following the aggravation of multiple offenses: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment seems to be unreasonable in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments in the instant case.