The lower court found the Defendants guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on interpretation of Article 29(3) of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on Defendant B corporation, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.