However, the above punishment against the Defendants for two years from the date when this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a person who has been married with Defendant A on May 1, 1986. Defendant A is a person who has been married with the complainant C on May 1, 1986.

On July 24, 2010, around 4:09, the Defendant sent to the B with a single sexual intercourse in a room where it is impossible to know the care room of the EM in Busan Northern-gu. D.

B. On August 12, 2010, around 1:49, the Defendant sent to the B with a single sexual intercourse within the mutual incompetence in Busan Northern-gu D.

C. On January 18, 201, at around 15:41, the Defendant sent to a restaurant with mutual incompetences B and once, respectively.

On February 13, 2011, at around 7:46, the Defendant sent to the B with a single sexual intercourse within the mutually incompetence in Busan Northern-gu D.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse, and even at the same time and place as in paragraph (1), the Defendant conspiredd with A four times with each other as above, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement by the prosecution against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to mobile phone output photographs and investigation reports (additional evidence photographs, recorded files, etc.);

1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act or more;