난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff is a foreigner of Siluri nationality.
On February 22, 2017, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status on a short-term basis, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on March 6, 2017.
B. On November 15, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision on the refusal of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion would be subject to persecution as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).
C. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on December 17, 2018, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on July 30, 2019.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Plaintiff liveded with his parent in the third village in around 1996, who was 3 years of age.
The Plaintiff was an important member of the “B”, a confidential organization (hereinafter “instant organization”).
The organization of this case had a bad behavior with human dignity.
In around 2016, the Plaintiff heard opportune stories that the Plaintiff would have come to the Jeju-do as a product, and fleded with her friendship house.
The members of the instant organization known that the Plaintiff escaped and sought to find the Plaintiff, and that the Plaintiff went to the natives house located in Anrara while leaving Sindo, and then entered the Republic of Korea and applied for refugee status.
Therefore, the plaintiff is unable to be protected by the country of nationality due to a well-founded fear of persecution on the ground of the status of a member of a specific social group under the Refugee Act and the Refugee Protocol, or the protection of the country of nationality.