2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. A. On March 18, 2014, around 11:40, the buildings and household buildings built and supplied by the Defendant on May 16, 2003 from 3 306 of the D Building C owned in Chuncheon City B (hereinafter referred to as the “instant kimchi cooling house”) from May 16, 2003 to May 18, 2003, which were destroyed by fire near the kimchi cooling house (the model E; hereinafter referred to as the “kimchi cooling house”), were destroyed by the above 306-Ba and 306 neighboring three generations (305, 405, 406).

(hereinafter “instant fire”). B.

On the other hand, C acquired ownership of the above D D D building 306, 306 (hereinafter “the instant building”), around November 11, 1992, and had been residing in the said building since that time. On September 2003, C purchased the kimchi cooling house of this case and used it in the instant building.

C. The Plaintiff, as an insurer of the fire insurance for the foregoing D building, completed an investigation into the fire site after the occurrence of the instant fire, and paid total of KRW 42,904,990 to the victims of the said C, etc. by April 23, 2014.

After receiving a request from the Chuncheon Police Station for the fire causes of this case, the National Institute of Scientific Investigation submitted a written appraisal of the following points.

０김치냉장고는 좌측 뒤쪽 하부가 국부적으로 심하게 연소된 상태이고 김치냉장고 뒤쪽에서 출화된 화염에 의해 주방 및 거실 등으로 연소 확대된 점으로 보아, 초기 발화지점은 김치냉장고 뒤쪽 좌측 하부로 한정 가능함. ０초기 발화지점으로 추정되는 김치냉장고 뒤쪽 좌측 하부 퓨즈로 들어가는 전원배선 부분과 김치냉장고 내부 배선인 전기배선 1점 끝단에서 각각 발화원으로 작용 가능한 전기적 특이점이 식별되며, 상대적으로 부하측에 해당하는 내부 배선으로 추정되는 전기배선 1점 끝단의 전기적 특이점 단락흔 단락은 전선간에 저항이 어떤 원인에 의해 없어져 접촉하는 것으로 일명 합선이라고도 하며, 전선이 서로 접촉되면 저항이 거의 없기...