건물명도 및 임차료 등
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff's assertion
가. 전라남도 나주시 C 대 621㎡는 F, G, H 공유 토지로서 위 지상에 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉠을 순차적으로 연결한 창고 약 40㎡ 건물은 원고의 선친 망 I이 제각 용도로 신축한 건물인데 피고가 임의로 창고로 사용하고 있다.
나. 전라남도 나주시 D 전 3263㎡는 J 소유 토지로서 위 지상에 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉠을 순차적으로 연결한 주택 약 44.8㎡ 건물 역시 원고의 선친 망 I이 신축한 것인데, 위 주택은 피고가 매년 시제를 모실 때 필요한 물품을 준비하는 조건으로 무상임차한 것임에도 피고는 2000. 이후 시제를 모시지 않고 있다.
C. Jeonnam-do, J-do, is under the Defendant’s direct cultivation of 830 square meters in E-si, Jeonnam-do.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff the C warehouse building and D house building in Jeonnam-do, and leave the above building from each of the above buildings, and to pay KRW 7,470,00 as C warehouse rent, KRW 24,90,00 as D house rent, KRW 17,430,00 as E return rent, respectively.
2. Even based on the Plaintiff’s assertion itself, it is entirely difficult to find out what title the Plaintiff could seek from the Defendant for the delivery of C Warehouse and D house and C warehouse rent, D house rent, and E return rent, at any time, from the point of view of the Plaintiff’s assertion.
(Plaintiff submitted the written withdrawal of the instant lawsuit, but the Defendant consented thereto). The Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.
3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.