청소년보호법위반
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in accommodation business with the trade name called ‘DMoel' in Jung-Eup City.
A person engaged in such lodging business shall not be allowed to engage in any business which disturbs public morals, such as allowing juveniles to have sexual intercourses with other people, or provide a place for such purpose.
Nevertheless, from July 13, 2014 to July 17, 2014, the Defendant, at the above 504 room, engaged in business activities disturbing public morals, such as having the instant E (18 years of age), F (17 years of age), G (16 years of age), etc. congested in the instant room.
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of witness F;
1. Each police statement of E and F;
1. Reporting on detection (violation of the Juvenile Protection Act);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify the result of handling violations;
1. Article 58 of the Juvenile Protection Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the selection of punishment, and subparagraph 5 of Article 58 of the Juvenile Protection Act;
1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the Defendant’s failure to manage the Defendant in light of the fact that a part of the instant juveniles could be confused with the Defendant as an adult, the circumstances leading to the instant crime, and the Defendant’s absence of any criminal history) exceeds