beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.08.28 2014가단17791

전기요금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 2, 2009, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a lease agreement with regard to the lease deposit of KRW 800,000,000, rent of KRW 17,000,00 (payment on August 5, 200), and from August 6, 2009 to August 5, 2014, the management fee of KRW 82,00,000,00 per square meter on the land floor and KRW 10,000 per square meter on the 1195, in total of 113,00,000, among the buildings listed in the attached list, on August 2, 2009.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

On July 5, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit with this court seeking delivery of a building, overdue rent, restoration cost, water supply fee, etc. under the head office 2012Gahap8172 (main office) on the ground that the Defendant had to pay the rent and management fee, etc. for June 201, and the Plaintiff had failed to pay the rent and management fee, etc. for the subsequent month, and the Plaintiff filed a claim for the refund of the rental deposit, etc. with the counterclaim (2012Gahap8189).

C. On November 13, 2013, this Court rendered a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and all the original Defendant appealed against the said judgment.

The Seoul High Court, the appellate court, on September 5, 2014, 262,897,424 won from the Plaintiff (i.e., KRW 800,00,000) - 537,102,576 won (i.e., late-payment KRW 190,502,278 won from March 22, 2012 to September 13, 2012; (ii) the Defendant was obligated to deliver money from the Plaintiff at the rate of KRW 114,63,989 to June 30, 2013 less the remainder of the India building from March 14, 2012 to 115,261,471 won; and (iii) the Plaintiff was also obligated to receive money from the Plaintiff at the same time, at the same time deducting the remainder of the India building from the 197th day of June 14, 2013 to June 30, 2017.

“.......”