2. The judgment is favorable to the defendant that the defendant was committed while committing the crime, and that the victims of the injury did not want the punishment of the defendant.

The fact that the defendant has inflicted serious injury on many victims, who has been punished for violence and fraud, re-offending despite the history of punishment, and that the amount of damage to the victim V is considerably 70 million won, and the damage has not been recovered even if so, is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances and other factors, including the motive, means, and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the lower court cannot be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion because the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.