However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 20, 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license, driven a Bran vehicle on the street from C to D, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.147% in blood at around 00:30 on November 20, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site photographs of a traffic accident;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2, Article 44 (1), subparagraph 1 of Article 152, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Part concerning dismissal of public prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, such as observation of protection and order to attend lectures;

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving a Brane car.

Defendant 1 driven the said car and proceeded with the street set in front of the “E” in “E” in “E” in “E” in “E” in “E” at the moment of net thousands.

At night, she is placed at night, and there are three lanes in which vehicles are parked on the road A. In such a case, drivers have duty of care to live well on the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the safe operation of the steering and the operation of the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and negligently parked on a Madge Road A, which was driven by the Defendant’s negligence, shocked into the front part of the passenger car driven by the Defendant, the lower part of the lower part of the G rocketing car’s left-hand part of the passenger car driven by the Defendant, and due to the shock, the damaged vehicle was pushed forward, and the part of the pents of the “E” building owned by the Victim H was carried out as the front part of the damaged vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence is equivalent to KRW 6 million for repair costs, such as the exchange of back pans of the said car, which is the victim F, and KRW 2450,000 for the repair cost of the above building owned by the victim H.