재물손괴등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal lies in the fact that the Defendant cut electricity lines at the time stated in the facts charged, but did not interfere with the victim E’s work of housing construction by inserting or inserting the victim E’s head debt, by inserting soil into the victim F, or by inserting soil into the victim F.
2. We examine the credibility of statements made by victims E, F, and D, which are evidence corresponding to each of the facts charged of this case, and the following circumstances that can be recognized by the court below after considering the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victims made a statement from investigative agencies to the court of the court below to the court of the court below, which corresponds to each of the following facts charged of this case. In particular, the defendant has consistently and specifically stated about the situation where the victim's head is dried or inserted in the victim E, and the situation where the victim spreads soil to the victim F by inserting, and made a statement that the victim D does not want punishment for the victim's violence at the court below, and the prosecutor cancelled this part of the prosecution. The victim's statement that the victim D was not subject to punishment. The victim's statement that the victim's injury was unfavorable to the defendant at the risk of the above evidence without any special reason, ③ The victim's first assault and assault, and thus, the victim's assertion that it was difficult for the victim to assert that it was an electricity and defense of this case.