except that the execution of each of the above penalties shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with E on April 6, 1993. A.

On September 21, 2010, the Defendant, around 21:00, sent to the intercompetence with B one-time sexual intercourse with F incompetence near Daegu-gun F.

B. On February 201, 201, the Defendant sent to the 202 dwelling place located in Daegu Northern-gu G, which is a 202 dwelling place located in G, with a single sexual intercourse with the said B.

C. On April 1, 2012, around 10:00, the Defendant sent a single sexual intercourse with H in Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, one time.

2. Defendant B was aware that he was a spouse of the above A, and even at each time and place described in paragraph (1), he had sexual intercourses with A three times respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements (for Defendant B, the six-time date)

1. A witness and E's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of Defendant A by the prosecution;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The content, summary, and photograph of text messages;

1. A complaint;

1. A family relation certificate or a certified transcript of the removed family register;

1. Results of the inquiry and reply to the Korea Highway Corporation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of an investigation report;

1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 38 (2) and 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confessions made by the defendants and reflects the facts that are the first offender).