도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On May 30, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon District Court on May 30, 2006, a fine of one million won for the same crime from the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court on February 19, 2009, and a fine of five hundred and fifty hundred thousand won for the same crime at the same court on June 29, 2015.
【Criminal Facts】
On September 24, 2016, the Defendant violated the provision prohibiting driving under the influence of alcohol twice or more, and again, operated CM5 automobiles without obtaining a driver’s license, from around 00:08 on September 24, 2016 to around 119, Seocheon-ro, Seocheon-ro, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, the same Doncheon-ro, Seocheon-ro, 119-ro, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-do, and from around 50 meters to the front road.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on the state of state of drinking drivers, and notification of the results of the regulation of drinking driving;
1. Registers of driver's licenses;
1. Previous records: The results of inquiry and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a summary order attached to a suspect's records of drinking alcohol driving);
1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and order to attend a lecture is a crime with a high risk of doing harm to the life, body, and the family to which the victim belongs, which has become a social issue. It seems that the risk of drinking driving and the strong punishment when violating the order to attend a lecture has been sufficiently notified to the people.
Although the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine on three occasions due to drunk driving, he/she again committed the instant crime, and was punished by a fine on August 19, 2016, separately from the said crime.
. The above.