The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, although the reasoning of the judgment below was partially inappropriate, its conclusion is acceptable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the requirements of Article 9-4 of the Act on the Prevention of Domestic Violence and Protection, etc. of Victims, and the legality of performing duties in the obstruction of the performance of official duties.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.