A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Defendant

A is the owner of the business who operates commercial sex acts in the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Office Office Ctel, and the defendant B is the head of the above office.

Defendants conspired to commit the same year from June 25, 2014

7. Until May 1, 200, the above officetels Nos. 403, 807, 808, and 908 were leased at the above location, and the business of arranging sexual traffic was conducted by having an unspecified number of men suffering from the location of sexual traffic, such as D and E, receive 140,000 won in return for sexual traffic, and let them have a sexual relationship with the male.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Descriptions of each police suspect interrogation protocol on D and E;

1. Application of existing Acts and subordinate statutes on one of the seized mobile phones (No. 2);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Defendant B of Article 30 of the Criminal Act: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who has been suspended from execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the following conditions considered for sentencing);

1. Probation Defendant A: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation Defendant B: As to Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Code [Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Code, Defendant B used 300,000 won as advance payment given by Defendant A and 50,000 won as advance payment given by the customer, and Defendant B provided 10,000 won of 50,000 won as advance payment given by the customer. (No. 47 of the investigation record, Defendant B delivered the picture received from the customer to Defendant A, and Defendant A paid a daily allowance directly to a female sexual traffic at the time of his retirement. Defendant B agreed to receive KRW 1,50,000 per month without connection with the chemical, and Defendant B did not have a customer on the day of crackdown.