약정금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is that it is reasonable to interpret the " spring interpretation" of the 8th of the judgment of the court of first instance, and as to the assertion added by the plaintiff in this court, the following 2. Additional Judgment is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(1) The Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for KRW 300 million and its delay damages, and the cause of the claim is an agreed amount under a real estate purchase service contract, and as the conjunctive tort damages, unjust enrichment, and real estate brokerage commission pursuant to a real estate brokerage agreement, the first instance court accepted only the part of the commission for mediation pursuant to a part of the real estate brokerage agreement. As to this, the Plaintiff appealed against only KRW 87,189,40 among the part against the Plaintiff, and the part of the late payment damages, the object of the judgment at this court is limited to the above KRW 87,189,400 and the part of the claim for late payment damages, and it is also accepted within the scope of the first instance judgment).2. Additional determination
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that, with respect to the site for the collective housing unit G G incheon-si, even though the Plaintiff’s brokerage did not enter into a sales contract between the Defendant and the owner of the said site, or there was no agreement on the Plaintiff’s remuneration, the Plaintiff’s act as a merchant who is a licensed real estate agent and directly caused the conclusion of the sales contract on behalf of the Defendant, and thus, the Plaintiff has the right to claim remuneration equivalent to
B. In light of the judgment, according to Article 61 of the Commercial Act, when a merchant commits an act on behalf of another person within the scope of his/her business, he/she may claim reasonable remuneration therefor. Therefore, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to provide services on the purchase of the site of the G Ilwon-won Multi-Family Housing, and provided efforts within the scope of business