beta
(영문) 부산지방법원동부지원 2020.05.12 2018가단9960

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

The Plaintiff is a person who operated C(hereinafter referred to as “C”) and D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “D”).

Defendant Company engaging in construction machinery rental business, etc. completed the registration of incorporation on June 19, 2003, and representative inside director E is the wife of the Plaintiff’s Dong F.

D on June 15, 2003, the Defendant Company sold to KRW 595,00,000 the mid-term four (registration number: G, H, I, J, and hereinafter “instant mid-term”).

On June 26, 2003, the registration number of the transfer of ownership was completed in the name of the defendant company with respect to the remaining parts of the transfer of the transfer of the transfer of the transfer of the transfer of the transfer of the transfer of the transfer of the transfer of the transfer

On June 26, 2003, the registration number of G is changed in the name of K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "K"), and the defendant Co., Ltd. was registered as a lending company.

On May 8, 2015, the Plaintiff was declared bankrupt (Jansan District Court 2014Hadan3178) and was granted decision to grant immunity on February 17, 2016 (Jansan District Court 2014do3178), and the decision to grant immunity became final and conclusive on March 3, 2016.

On August 20, 2018, the Plaintiff failed to pay value-added tax of KRW 93,787,520 as of August 20, 2018.

(3) The defendant company was established as a result of the plaintiff's receipt of this case's daily living expenses from the plaintiff and the plaintiff's family. (3), 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 21, 19, 21, 6-1, 6-1, 2, 3, 7-1, 7-1, 2, 2, 5, and 6-1, 7-1, 2, 5, and 6-1, 7-1, 7-2, 7-2, 7-2, 6, and 6-2, the plaintiff's argument that the plaintiff's health has deteriorated as of June 203, 203.

However, the Plaintiff only delivered the seal of the Defendant Company to change the name of the instant flag from D to the Defendant Company, and the Defendant Company arbitrarily used it and arbitrarily used it.