A. Since the assessment was conducted on November 28, 1918 in the name of J on November 28, 1918, I forest land 92 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) at the time of influence is unregistered until now.

B. As the above J died on July 13, 1949, K inherited his/her property solely as a principal grandchild, and after that death on April 6, 1976, K inherited his/her property jointly as the final inheritance shares as shown in the separate sheet following the progress as shown in the separate sheet of inheritance calculation.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 3-1, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, and the result of inquiry into the leisure market by this court

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff is the plaintiff's husband, and L and his family members have cultivated crops from the previous date, and L and his family members have been married to the plaintiff on June 13, 1977 and thereafter have been donated to the plaintiff around that time. Since L and their family members have continuously occupied the land in excess of 20 years and have been in possession for planting lost trees, the plaintiff and their family members have continued to occupy the land in excess of 20 years and have been in possession for planting lost trees. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants who jointly inherit the land in this case against the defendant who jointly inherited the land in the deceasedJ for the completion of the prescriptive prescription is justified. 2) Since the land in this case was under the deceased's name, the plaintiff's heir and his family members were owned by the deceased J since they were aware of the fact that the land in this case was owned by the deceased J, and even if they were independent possession, since the plaintiff did not occupy the land in this case and did not occupy it at the expiration of ten years from the expiration date of prescription.

B. According to Article 197(1) of the Civil Act, the possessor of an article is presumed to have occupied the article as his/her own intention, so the possessor shall acquire by prescription.