However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who operates a game room in the name of "C" from the original building B at the original city and the first floor of "C".

No one shall provide game products with the contents of which are different from those of the game products classified for distribution or use, or display or keep them for such purposes.

Nevertheless, from January 10, 2019 to February 24, 2019, the Defendant, unlike the rating classification (CC-N-14120-001) by the Game Rating Board, provided 40 games for unspecified customers by installing a separate settlement window and providing 50 games with specific points increased due to the display of the background screen.

As a result, the defendant provided game products, the contents of which are different from the contents of the rating classification by the Game Rating Board, for customers' use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each investigation report, seizure records, and response statutes as a result of cross-performance assistance;

1. Subparagraph 4 of Article 45 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and Article 32 (1) 2 of the same Act on criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (i.e., confession, primary crime, and the fact that the period of crime has not elapsed);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation;