beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.04.25 2016구합65016

보상금증액

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 188,647,200 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from September 11, 2015 to April 25, 2017.

Reasons

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) Business title - Business name: Hanam-si Urban Development Project (B) - Business site: Cwon C 155,713 square meters: - Business operator: Defendant - A public notice of Gyeonggi-do on December 31, 2012, and public notice of Hanam-si on January 9, 2015

(b) The Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on July 27, 2015 - The date of expropriation: September 10, 2015 - The date of expropriation: 2,758 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) located in the instant project area, - Compensation: 3,43,710,000 won - An appraisal corporation: two appraisal corporations and stock companies;

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on May 26, 2016 - Compensation: 3,599,190,000 won - An appraisal corporation: Uniform appraisal Corporation, one appraisal corporation, and one appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “objects”) for the said appraisal (hereinafter referred to as “appraisals on an objection”); and hereinafter referred to as “appraisals on an objection”).

D. The appraiser G’s appraisal results and the results of the appraisal supplementation (hereinafter “court appraiser”) (hereinafter “the results of the appraisal,” “the results of the court appraisal,” “the results of the appraisal supplementation,” “the results of the court appraisal supplementation” - the court appraisal results: 3,787,837,200 won (assessment of the specific use area of the instant land based on the natural green area and the development restriction zone): The court appraisal results: 5,867,093,400 won (assessment of the specific use area of the instant land based on the natural green area released from the development restriction zone) [the grounds for recognition]] without any dispute; Gap’s evidence 1, 2, Eul’s evidence 1, 2, 2, and 3 evidence (including each number); the results of the court appraisal conducted by G, the results of the court appraisal, the results of the court appraisal, and the purport

2. The plaintiff's assertion is that the high-tech industry and housing site development project in accordance with the metropolitan plan is embodied and applied to the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs for the cancellation of development restriction zones. The Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs applied to the land of this case on May 18, 2009.