The punishment of the court below against the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

Although the Defendant did not have a criminal record, and the mistake is divided, each of the crimes of this case is several victims and the amount of damage is high, and the case is serious, considering the fact that the Defendant did not agree with the victims and did not recover from damage, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of this case, the punishment sentenced by the lower court cannot be deemed to be heavy.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in the fourth part of the judgment of the court below, since it is obvious that the "victim, etc." is a clerical error in the "delivery, etc.", the correction shall be made ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.