2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is divided into his mistake, and that the damaged person is the defendant's wife by agreement with the victim.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have inflicted an injury on a aged female, and the nature of the crime is bad, the injury is serious, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the period of suspension of execution due to the same kind of injury in spite of the record of juvenile protective disposition, fine, suspension of execution, and punishment having been sentenced in several times due to violent crimes, etc., and there is no change of circumstances that may otherwise determine the age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the range of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the sentencing committee of the Supreme Court, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, etc., are considered in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, and the sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the sentencing committee of the Supreme Court after the

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.