beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.03.29 2017구단65565

요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 26, 1984, the Plaintiff was employed by Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nan Heavy Industries”), a building company located in the Dong-dong, Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, and was employed on December 31, 2014. On December 28, 2015, after retirement, the Plaintiff applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant on December 30, 2015, after receiving a diagnosis of “the opening of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the door, the right door, the back of the back of the back of the door, the right door, the back of the back of the back of the back of the door, the right door of the back of the back of the door, and damage to the back of the back of the door (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

B. On June 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) deemed that the Plaintiff had a physical burden on the part of the instant injury while performing his/her duties, such as the installation, dismantling, etc. of the workshop after his/her entry; (b) however, from July 11, 2002 to January 23, 2006, there was no appeal for any symptoms on the part of the instant injury and disease at the time of the medical care due to occupational accidents; and (c) after the completion of the medical care, it is reasonable to find that the instant injury and disease were caused by his/her occupational duties or aggravated the injury and disease beyond the nature of the nature. However, the Plaintiff’s injury and disease were found to be low in relation to the Plaintiff’s duties by considering the Plaintiff’s occupational ability (f) but the Plaintiff’s injury and disease were confirmed to have no effect on the part of the Plaintiff at the time of his/her retirement, and there was no clear reason for the Plaintiff to have the result of the instant disposition, such as weight and disease.

C. The Plaintiff filed a request for examination with the Defendant, but rejected the request from the Defendant, and filed a request for reexamination to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee.