Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

At around 13:10 on March 31, 2014, the Defendant jointly with C, and on the grounds that the victim E (the age of 38) interfered with the passage of the bridge vehicle to directors, the Defendant: (a) dumpeded the victim’s flaps; (b) dumped the victim’s back head by drinking; (c) opened the front door of the vehicle flap; and (d) tried to report the cell phone 112; (b) dump the victim’s body flap; (c) dumped the victim’s chest and head parts by drinking; and (d) dump the victim’s bump and head flap with his hand, dumping the victim’s bump and head flaps.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel, recorded on the fifth trial date of the witness E, claimed that the Defendant and his defense counsel met the victim’s head while having flab with the victim and flab, and that the victim’s body was flabed by closing the first door door of the flabing vehicle. However, the Defendant and his defense counsel did not assault the victim in collaboration with C.

In light of the above evidence, the defendant, C, etc., and the victim, the team leader of the Lee Jae-gu Center, attempted to see the situation where the defendant, C, etc. were punished for a trial on the ground that the bridge cannot pass by the bridge because the bridge was obstructed by the passage of the bridge. The victim, who was the team leader of the bridge center, tried to do so by her hand, and the defendant was faced with the victim's back by drinking. C also was able to see the victim's chest and head by drinking at the same time and her hand, and the victim's chest and head were flick, and the victim's flick and head flick, and the defendant's body was flick in the body of the victim by opening the bridge of the bridge.

According to the above facts, the defendant and C's actions are directly related to the same opportunity at the same place.