However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who manufactures a misappropriation of trademark from May 2014 to Seoul Jung-gu C.

피고인은 2014. 9. 11. 15:30경 위 공장에서 판매할 목적으로 상표권자 ‘샤넬’의 등록상표인 ‘CHANEL'(상표등록번호 제309448호)과 동일한 모양의 위조 상표가 부착된 가방 40점(판매시가 6,000,000원)을 제조하여 보관한 것을 비롯하여 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 4가지 품목 총 2,270점(판매시가 합계 9,300,000원)을 제조하여 이를 판매할 목적으로 보관하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant committed the infringement of trademark rights.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (report on the results of the C Factory Control);

1. Seizure records;

1. Suppression photographs;

1. Application of statutes of the original trademark right register;

1. Article 93 of the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 93 of the elective Trademark Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 97-2(1) of the Trademark Act and Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act that the defendant, who has two times the same kind of reasons for sentencing, committed the instant crime, cannot be deemed to be less than liability. However, inasmuch as the defendant, in return for processing the product infringing on trademark rights, is a person who is officially used by the orderer in return for the processing of the product infringing on trademark rights, and is not expected to have gross profits from the said crime, and the defendant committed the instant crime to support his family including his second offspring with language disorder, it constitutes the instant crime for supporting his family, and is contradictory, and all other circumstances are taken into account